The argument of the validity and reliability of online information, such as wikipedia, has been a focus of discussion.
"Cloning pioneer did fake results, probe finds", New Scientist reported. The flawed study was published in May 2005 by Hwang and colleagues in Science (vol 308 p 1777).
Is there a way for Science to attach a note (or some kind of notice) to readers of this particular article in all its circulating copies that the work reported in the paper has been found deliberately fabricated?
I believe wikipedia, in fact most online publications, would be able to do this quite easily.
No comments:
Post a Comment