tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7828200.post109841830204593159..comments2023-09-22T18:12:19.503+10:00Comments on Random Walk in Learning: Federated Search ( The Buntine Oration - Reflection 1)Albert Iphttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14938101816494973123noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7828200.post-1098661134626472352004-10-25T09:38:00.000+10:002004-10-25T09:38:00.000+10:00Thank you, Stephen for responding and again for hi...Thank you, Stephen for responding and again for highlighting a blind spot which I failed to update since the 1999 writing. I now totally agree that there is no reason why type 2 and type 3 data are not subjected to the same economical forces of type 1 data. While there are many resources (type 1 data) locked in fee-paying repositories, there are many resources which are based on more liberated Albert Iphttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14938101816494973123noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7828200.post-1098627713139185772004-10-25T00:21:00.000+10:002004-10-25T00:21:00.000+10:00The point of dispute is in this paragraph:
"On on...The point of dispute is in this paragraph:<br /><br />"On one hand, SG owners need to competitively bid for funding, but there are obviously significant duplication in terms of infra-structure and scalability. Referring back to the data model I developed (see Meta Meta Meta Data Draft 0.1, the value the SG owners would protect in order to maintain their survival is 'type 2' data. I did not see Stephen Downeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06140591903467372209noreply@blogger.com